- Decode with Adrija
- Posts
- No Food, Eat The Rich
No Food, Eat The Rich
Have you stopped seeing aesthetic food photos on your feed? There's reason.
The other day, I was scrolling through photos from my London trip—blue skies, plenty of art, a few street shots—and found something odd: almost no food photos. A handful of shots of meals I cooked myself (undercooked, unappetizing to look at mostly), but nothing like the plated-perfection I used to snap before a bite. I am the same person who would take a photo of food before even touching it. And now I don’t.
So I started thinking about this shift. Where are the food photos?
For a long time, glossy food photos were the softest currency on the internet: harmless aesthetic posts, a way to collect likes. A fork in mid-air, a cake with perfect icing, a sunlit plate. That look was once a compliment to the craft of food photography. Now it reads, more often than not, like a flex: money, mobility, immunity to crises the rest of the world is living through.
So, when did not posting food photos on social media become a political act? And posting them, cringe behaviour? I’m not so sure, and neither are the well-read people I spoke to over the last two weeks. But the shift is there in the data, in the feeds, in the way people now hesitate before posting that restaurant spread.

A photographer friend told me two years ago, "I don't post anything that feels like a show." He had stopped posting photos of "anything that reeks of privilege", with restaurant spreads at the top of his what-not-to-post list. His reasoning: when inequality is this visible, an image can read as flaunting. He didn't want to be part of that signal.
The new shorthand is simple: you are what you post — and posting a lavish meal in a moment of mass suffering or extreme economic strain reads like a public show of privilege.
My conversations with creators, some research, and plenty of scrolling revealed this: The 18th-century slogan "eat the rich" is alive and viral online in 2025. Not posting food photos has become part of that messaging.
The Guardian, a few years ago, noted viral TikToks featuring "fresh-faced youngsters menacingly raising their forks at anyone with cars that have start buttons or fridges that have water + ice dispensers." It reads like satire, but the sentiment underneath isn't joking.
Gaza changed the feed
A friend and creator, Prapti Elizabeth — who has a fairly large audience (about 268–269K followers) on Instagram— told me something I’ve heard often in private: after the Gaza war she began to pivot. She started posting information, donation links, and boycott campaigns; she said the images of starving children changed what she felt comfortable celebrating online.
Now when a bakery gifts her a Christmas cake she tells them she won’t post it. Some brands “get it.” Others simply ghost. Her voice, one of the small handful that publicly engaged on Gaza when many comforted silence, meant fewer safe sponsor fits and eventually a career rethink.
She isn't the only one. Many creators have been consciously avoiding food posts. Politics meeting optics is the first force that hardened this trend. The war in Gaza changed what some creators felt comfortable celebrating. Images and reporting of civilians trapped by hunger and conflict — and the very real deaths of people trying to access food amid the blockade and fighting — made plain celebrations of abundance look, to many, grotesque.
Those constant reports, those visuals, hundreds of deaths linked to people trying to source food: that reality shifts how people read a cake photo.
The second force: a youth-driven culture shift.
From Sri Lanka's protests to waves of posts in Nepal calling out "NepoKids," social media became a space where unease with wealth, nepotism and inequality turned into meme, movement, culture. These movements have normalised the idea that flaunting comfort is morally fraught.
The Algorithm Agrees
Then there’s the fact that food photos are just not working algorithmically. A 2022 article in Eater reports that creators with five-figure followings say they struggle to reach 1,000 likes on food photos compared to earlier. They blame shifts in feed algorithms and a loss of appetite for pure‐plate posts.
“I AM SICK OF RICH OUT OF TOUCH INFLUENCERS...”
I could go on, but this video with the blunt title rips into repetitive unboxings, luxury hauls and content that treats wealth as entertainment while viewers face precarity. You’ll see why a lot of people now flinch at luxe food content.
And if you need a person to hang the “eat the rich” backlash on, look no further than the RichTok arc. Prapti directed me to creators like Becca Bloom, who built a huge following showcasing Hermès hauls and caviar for her cats. Her rise collided with backlash when mass displays of wealth began to read as grotesque.
The cultural blowback now terms her as “tone-deaf” or even “Marie Antoinette of TikTok.”
There's a psychological layer too: A survey (reported widely in 2024) found 43% of Gen Z and 41% of millennials report “money dysmorphia”, a distorted sense of financial insecurity fuelled in part by social media comparison. That collective anxiety sharpens resentment toward flaunted wealth.
To be clear: this isn't about policing content. Food photos can still be powerful, culturally rich, aesthetic, meaningful. The difference is whether they tell something more than: "look what I got".
When you point your camera at a dish now, the question isn't whether it looks good. It's what you're signalling. Are you feasting, flexing, or telling the story behind the plate? That calculation — the one that makes people pause mid-reach for their phone, the one that turns a reflex into a choice — is why we're taking fewer food photos. Or at least, why I am.
On My Bookmarks
Silenced, OnlineEquality Now’s new research provides rare empirical detail on how digital platforms serve both as avenues for abuse and as battlegrounds for gender justice in India, reflecting the everyday personal consequences of digital policy. |
![]() | Sweden’s Gang WarThis piece explores how social media and encrypted apps in Sweden are being used as recruitment and operational tools by gang networks targeting children under 15. |
Single = CoolChanté Joseph argues in Vogue that being single is increasingly styled as the default “cool” status, while openly having a boyfriend is framed as awkward or uncool. The piece has gone viral online, followed by many viral memes. |
Got a story to share or something interesting from your social media feed? Drop me a line, and I might highlight it in my next newsletter.
See you in your inbox, every other Wednesday at 12 pm!
MESSAGE FROM OUR SPONSOR
Find your customers on Roku this Black Friday
As with any digital ad campaign, the important thing is to reach streaming audiences who will convert. To that end, Roku’s self-service Ads Manager stands ready with powerful segmentation and targeting options. After all, you know your customers, and we know our streaming audience.
Worried it’s too late to spin up new Black Friday creative? With Roku Ads Manager, you can easily import and augment existing creative assets from your social channels. We also have AI-assisted upscaling, so every ad is primed for CTV.
Once you’ve done this, then you can easily set up A/B tests to flight different creative variants and Black Friday offers. If you’re a Shopify brand, you can even run shoppable ads directly on-screen so viewers can purchase with just a click of their Roku remote.
Bonus: we’re gifting you $5K in ad credits when you spend your first $5K on Roku Ads Manager. Just sign up and use code GET5K. Terms apply.
Was this email forwarded to you? Subscribe



